Google asks 9th Circuit for emergency stay, says Epic ruling ‘is dangerous’

Google has asked the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to put a hold on changes it would have to make under Judge James Donato's recent decision in Epic v. Google. The company has already filed a similar request with Judge Donato, but will not wait until Friday to see whether the judge, who has vowed to "break down barriers," will grant Google Press a stay of judgment.

The decision, which Google appealed, will force Google to distribute third-party app stores on Google Play, and many of these changes, such as Google Play not being required to charge for apps distributed through Google Play, are scheduled to take effect from November 1. In just two weeks. However, in the district court that Donat Judges refused to be inadequate, many Google discussions have been repeated, and the company has declared that "threatens Google Play's ability, which offers safe and reliable user experience." Masu.

"This does not harm Google. Android users, the developer of Android and the developer of a device that established a prosperous company in Android, the vice president of La Regulation. One Google Lee-Anne Mulholland is written in the distributed information balloon.

The fact sheet is bulleted into five different sections, and the section headers give you an idea of Google’s objections:

• “Forcing Google to distribute third-party app stores within Google Play harms safety and privacy”

• “Handing hundreds of third-party Android app stores access to Google Play’s app catalog reduces developers’ control over app distribution and puts users at risk”

• “Linking out from within an app on Google Play to external app downloads is dangerous”

• “Removing Play billing as an option reduces important protections and features users rely on”

• “Rushing the implementation of remedies will raise risks to users, developers, and device makers”